A few weeks ago, Corey Harris and I briefly wrote about liability that can fall back on the insured in our respective posts, Errors in Insurance Application May Leave You with No Coverage and More on Errors in Insurance Applications. This week, presents a situation in which liability may fall back on the insurance agent. Similar to the situations mentioned the posts above, an insurance agent may be liable for errors in an insurance application, for giving improper insurance advice, or negligently failing to procure insurance for a customer. The laws vary from state to state, but generally insurance agents owe a duty to their customers, that, if breached, could make an insurance agent liable for resulting harm.

In Florida, the Supreme Court has recognized that an insurance agent may be liable to a customer under theories based both in contract and negligence. See Wachovia Ins. Services v. Toomey, 994 So. 2d 980, 990 n.4 (Fla. 2008). In Toomey, the Florida Supreme Court noted that an insurance customer may sue his or her insurance agent for negligence if:

[1] [the insurance agent] knew or should have known that the [customer] ‘wanted to purchase [an] insurance policy…;’ [2] that [the insurance agent] owed a duty to the [customer] to procure such an insurance policy; [3] that [the insurance agent was] negligent in failing to procure such an insurance policy; and [4] as a result of [the insurance agent’s] negligence, damages were suffered. Romo v. Amedex Ins. Co., 930 So. 2d 643, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Also in Toomey, the Court noted that an insurance agent owes a duty of reasonable care in rendering advice on insurance matters. Insurance agents generally know about this duty and purchase errors and omissions insurance (E&O insurance) to protect themselves from liability if that duty is breached.

In a recent news story out of Georgia, The Brunswick News reported that Glynn County Georgia continued paying thousands of dollars in insurance premiums for a building even after the building was razed in 2003. The county’s insurance agent admitted that his agency was responsible for a clerical error on the policy, asserting that the policy was actually intended to cover the building next door to the demolished building. The agent had reason to believe that the insurance company would have honored a claim made on the intended property, but was also quick to point out that the insurance agency “carries a significant amount of ‘errors and omissions insurance’ that would have covered a claim.” The insurance agent obviously wanted the article to be clear that his client would have been covered despite his error.

While each case depends on the specific facts leading to the problem and the particular law of the jurisdiction, generally, if it turns out that an insurance claim is denied because there is no coverage due to an insurance agent’s error, the insured may able to collect from the insurance agent or the agent’s errors and omissions insurance. However, the amount of damages that may be recovered from the agent or E&O insurance is generally limited to the terms of the policy that the customer should have received. See Klonis v. Armstrong, 436 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Are you looking for help?

Let us help you. Call now: (877) 449-4700

info@merlinlawgroup.com | Monday – Friday, 9 AM – 5PM

Why choose Merlin Law Group?

Founded in 1985, our law firm continues to be dedicated to representing insurance policyholders throughout the United States. Collectively, our lawyers are licensed to practice in 25 states. In fact, many of Merlin Law Group’s attorneys worked for the insurance industry before joining the firm, so they bring a strong understanding of insurance company practices. Anyone can file a claim, but it takes experience, knowledge, and savvy to achieve a truly successful outcome. As The Policyholder’s Advocate®, Merlin Law Group aims to drive positive change within the insurance sector by obtaining justice for our clients and educating policyholders on how to navigate insurer bad faith tactics.

When we handle property insurance claim disputes, we hire the most experienced and qualified expert witnesses to evaluate your insurance claim and testify on your behalf. In most cases, we can advance the fees for this. Typically, we hire experts such as engineers, contractors, independent roofing consultants and other professionals to perform a thorough assessment on all possible causes of damages. This is a process that provides us with a very detailed and all-inclusive estimate for determining and justifying a proper settlement. Our use of these professional expert witnesses sets us apart from other insurance law firms.

Submit a free case review