“All Risk” policies generally contain a plethora of exclusions that limit or bar coverage for many types of damage. For instance, if a loss is caused by wear and tear, deterioration or improper installation, many policies will specifically exclude payment. Fortunately for some, many commercial and residential insurance policies contain ensuing loss clauses that may afford coverage for damages resulting from one of these perils.

Many courts throughout the nation have discussed the ensuing loss language and most have come to the same conclusion. In Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Insurance Company, the Florida Supreme Court analyzed the ensuing loss clause contained in an exclusion for damages caused by a design defect. The court wrote:

The design defect exclusion clause in the Swire-Zurich Builder’s Risk Policy is not ambiguous. “Loss or damage” as used in the first prong of the clause clearly means loss caused directly by the design defect. This type of loss is not covered under the policy. Further, the only reasonable definition for the term “physical loss or damage” as used in the ensuing loss provision of the clause is damage that occurs subsequent to, and as a result of, a design defect. This type of loss is covered under the policy.

Plainly stated, an ensuing loss is a covered damage that results from an excluded peril. This means that if there are two different losses, the first excluded by the policy and the second covered, the second loss will be covered if it results from the first.

For instance, if a pipe inside a wall breaks because it is old and deteriorated, the damages to the pipe would not be covered if there is an exclusion for deterioration and/or wear and tear. However if water is discharged from the broken pipe and results in significant water damage to the drywall, floors, or other covered property, these water losses may be covered if the appropriate ensuing loss provision is contained in the policy.

Another example is if an association’s roof is damaged by wear and tear and subsequently begins to leak into the building. Assuming that the damages to the roof (wear and tear) are excluded, the subsequent water damages could still be covered if such a provision applies.

Ensuing loss clauses are important for associations and unit owners alike. Both should read their policies carefully and understand how ensuing loss clauses affect the coverage they purchase.

Are you looking for help?

Let us help you. Call now: (877) 449-4700

info@merlinlawgroup.com | Monday – Friday, 9 AM – 5PM

Why choose Merlin Law Group?

Founded in 1985, our law firm continues to be dedicated to representing insurance policyholders throughout the United States. Collectively, our lawyers are licensed to practice in 25 states. In fact, many of Merlin Law Group’s attorneys worked for the insurance industry before joining the firm, so they bring a strong understanding of insurance company practices. Anyone can file a claim, but it takes experience, knowledge, and savvy to achieve a truly successful outcome. As The Policyholder’s Advocate®, Merlin Law Group aims to drive positive change within the insurance sector by obtaining justice for our clients and educating policyholders on how to navigate insurer bad faith tactics.

When we handle property insurance claim disputes, we hire the most experienced and qualified expert witnesses to evaluate your insurance claim and testify on your behalf. In most cases, we can advance the fees for this. Typically, we hire experts such as engineers, contractors, independent roofing consultants and other professionals to perform a thorough assessment on all possible causes of damages. This is a process that provides us with a very detailed and all-inclusive estimate for determining and justifying a proper settlement. Our use of these professional expert witnesses sets us apart from other insurance law firms.

Submit a free case review