Appraisal: When Can It Be Invoked

Oct 21, 2013 By Corey Harris Insurance

Insurance policies have contained contractual appraisal clauses for many years. Recently, however, there have been a number of disputes over when appraisal can be invoked and when it can be rightfully rejected. Appraisal is appropriate when there is a “dispute” over the amount of loss. The problem faced by many courts has been when this “dispute” actually comes into existence.

In general courts have held that a “dispute” exists once there has been a good faith opportunity for each side to investigate the claim and no consensus has been reached. In one of the first cases on point a Florida Appellate Court ruled in U.S. Fidelity & Guarantee Company v. Romay,1 that a policyholder cannot generally invoke appraisal without there first being a meaningful exchange of information through compliance with the post loss obligations contained in the insurance contract. Courts in other states, including North Carolina and Arizona, have come to the same conclusion.2

If appraisal is appropriate, however, neither party has the right to refuse to participate in the process.3 Because the appraisal provision is a material term of the contract, an improper refusal of a valid demand can be considered a breach of the insurance contract entitling the other party to damages.4

Appraisal is sometimes a quicker, less expensive, mechanism for resolving disputed property damage claims. This is especially true with large losses suffered by condominium and homeowners associations. If you are unsure whether appraisal is right for your association’s claim, or if your insurer has refused to participate in the appraisal process, you should contact experienced counsel to discuss the best course of action. In some circumstances you may be able to have a court order compliance with the provision and order that the insurer reimburse you for any out of pocket expenses incurred as a result.

1 U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Romay, 744 467 ( Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
2 Hailey v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 640 S.E.2d 849 (N.C. App. 2007);. Tavilla v. Employer Mutual Cas. Ins. Co., 2008 WL 2154800 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
3 United Community Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 642 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1994).
4 Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Fraiman, 588 S.W. 2d 681 (Tex. App. – Houston 1979).


Are you looking for help?

Let us help you. Call now: (877) 449-4700 | Monday – Friday, 9 AM – 5PM

Why choose Merlin Law Group?

Founded in 1985, our law firm continues to be dedicated to representing insurance policyholders throughout the United States. Collectively, our lawyers are licensed to practice in 25 states. In fact, many of Merlin Law Group’s attorneys worked for the insurance industry before joining the firm, so they bring a strong understanding of insurance company practices. Anyone can file a claim, but it takes experience, knowledge, and savvy to achieve a truly successful outcome. As The Policyholder’s Advocate®, Merlin Law Group aims to drive positive change within the insurance sector by obtaining justice for our clients and educating policyholders on how to navigate insurer bad faith tactics.

When we handle property insurance claim disputes, we hire the most experienced and qualified expert witnesses to evaluate your insurance claim and testify on your behalf. In most cases, we can advance the fees for this. Typically, we hire experts such as engineers, contractors, independent roofing consultants and other professionals to perform a thorough assessment on all possible causes of damages. This is a process that provides us with a very detailed and all-inclusive estimate for determining and justifying a proper settlement. Our use of these professional expert witnesses sets us apart from other insurance law firms.

Submit a free case review